The research behind it

Every Psique test draws on instruments published in peer-reviewed journals. They are all here, with a link to the original paper and to Google Scholar in case the DOI sits behind a paywall.

35 references Β· 12 tests

Honesty first: Psique is not a validated adaptation of these instruments. The items are rewritten in everyday language and shortened, the comparison sample is not representative of any population, and results are not a diagnosis. What is real: the trait structure and the relationships between traits come from this literature, not from thin air.

🧭 Political spectrum

See the test β†’

Feldman & Johnston (2014). Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358

Empirical basis for ideology being several independent axes, not one.

Duckitt & Sibley (2009). Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 98–109

Dual-process model: two distinct motivations behind conservatism.

Eysenck (1954). The Psychology of Politics

The historical origin of measuring politics on two axes instead of one.

🧠 Big Five personality

See the test β†’

Goldberg (1992). Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42

The paper that established the markers for the five factors.

Soto & John (2017). BFI-2. JPSP, 113(1), 117–143

Modern version of the inventory, with revised facets.

🌱 Self-esteem test

See the test β†’

Rosenberg (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton UP

The original 10-item scale, the most widely used short instrument in psychology

Sowislo & Orth (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 213–240

Longitudinal meta-analysis: low self-esteem precedes depression, not the other way round

Orth & Robins (2014). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5)

How self-esteem develops across the lifespan (it rises until about 60)

βš–οΈ Moral foundations

See the test β†’

Graham, Haidt & Nosek (2009). JPSP, 96(5), 1029–1046

The study showing that progressives and conservatives draw on different foundations.

Graham et al. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. JPSP, 101(2), 366–385

Validation of the questionnaire and the full map of the moral domain.

Iyer et al. (2012). Libertarian morality. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366

Adds the liberty foundation, missing from the original version.

πŸ’Ž Your values

See the test β†’

Schwartz (1992). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65

The original theory of the ten universal values and their circular structure.

Schwartz et al. (2001). PVQ. J. Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542

The PVQ questionnaire, the format this test is modelled on.

πŸ’˜ Attachment style

See the test β†’

Brennan, Clark & Shaver (1998). ECR β€” Attachment Theory and Close Relationships

The original ECR questionnaire, the basis of nearly all later research.

Wei et al. (2007). ECR Short Form. J. Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204

The validated short form this test is modelled on.

Fraley, Waller & Brennan (2000). ECR-R. JPSP, 78(2), 350–365

Psychometric revision confirming the two continuous dimensions.

🧘 Emotional intelligence test

See the test β†’

Salovey & Mayer (1990). Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211

The original model: emotional intelligence as a set of skills, not a trait

Wong & Law (2002). The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274

The 4 dimensions (own, others, use, regulation) and the reference scale (WLEIS)

Joseph & Newman (2010). Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54–78

Meta-analysis: EI predicts performance beyond personality and IQ

🀑 Sense of humour test

See the test β†’

Martin et al. (2003). Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75

The original instrument: the Humor Styles Questionnaire and its 4 styles

Schneider, Voracek & Tran (2018). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(3)

Meta-analysis: which styles track with wellbeing and which with distress

Plessen et al. (2020). Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 110218

Meta-analysis: how humour styles map onto the Big Five

😈 Evil test

See the test β†’

Paulhus & Williams (2002). Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563

The paper that defined the dark triad as a construct.

Jones & Paulhus (2014). Short Dark Triad (SD3). Assessment, 21(1), 28–41

Validated short form (SD3), the basis for this test format.

πŸ—£οΈ Pushover test

See the test β†’

Rahim (1983). Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376

Styles of handling interpersonal conflict.

🎭 Honesty-Humility

See the test β†’

Lee & Ashton (2004). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358

The paper that established the six-factor model.

Ashton & Lee (2009). HEXACO-60. J. Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345

The brief 60-item version, the reference format.

πŸ•ΉοΈ Locus of control test

See the test β†’

Rotter (1966). Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28

The original construct: internal vs external expectancies of reinforcement control

Ng, Sorensen & Eby (2006). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8)

Workplace meta-analysis: internal locus tracks with satisfaction and performance

Cheng, Cheung, Chio & Chan (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 139(1)

Cross-cultural meta-analysis: the locus–anxiety–depression link across countries